Guitar Cabinet Mic Shootout

Date:2020/2/13 22:20:35 Hits:

We all know that guitarists are obsessive about their tone, and rightfully so. They audition everything from guitars to amps, tubes, speakers, pickups, strings, pedals, even replacing capacitors and potentiometers in their guitars. But unless you’re playing guitar in a room where you don’t have to mic your amp, there’s one more component of your sound that is the conduit that allows everyone else to hear your guitar. That frequently underestimated component is the mic in front of your guitar cabinet.

I spent nearly 40 years as a recording engineer, and I’ve used dozens of different mics on guitar cabinets. I’ve learned first-hand what a drastic difference a mic can make in translating a guitarist’s tone, and it’s far more significant than many people realize. Some of the best studio and live players understand that the signal chain determing their sound doesn’t end when the sound comes out of their speaker cabinet. The signal chain follows all the way through to the mic — the ultimate arbiter of what is heard by listeners, whether in a club, in a coliseum, or on the radio.

The Goal
Most people don’t have the luxury of auditioning dozens of guitar mics. For this article, I wanted to record a wide assortment of mics in order to show you how great an impact the microphone can make using identical source material and calibrated mic placement so the only variable is the microphone.

The Process
I started off by making a list of mics and circulating it among my engineering comrades here at Sweetwater Studios to see which mics I should include. And yes, these are all mics that Sweetwater currently sells. There are some perennial standards, such as the Shure SM57, Sennheiser MD 421 II, and Royer R-121, as well as some mics you may not know. I took all of them into Sweetwater’s Studio B and Sweetwater’s Don Carr provided the playing.

Because mic placement is paramount to how a mic sounds on a guitar cab, each mic was placed in exactly the same position on the speaker cabinet (details below). I decided to use two performances (one dirty and one clean) and used a re-amped signal for consistency so the performances are exactly the same every time. I went to great lengths to make sure that the test was fair and all the levels were matched (easier said than done). Don and I used premium components throughout the signal chain to make sure that the mics were presented in the best possible light. These sound clips will enable you to listen to 21 different mics, ranging in price from $99 to $3999, and hear how drastic a difference the microphone makes.

The goal was not to pick a “best” guitar mic, but rather to explore options. You may notice, as Don and I did, that mic preference often depends on the source material. You may like one mic best on the dirty sound and a completely different mic on the clean sound. As I’ve listened and shared these files, it’s been interesting to hear how widely varied the opinions are when it comes to what people like.

My hope is that you hear some mics you haven’t ever heard before, and if you’re like me, find some mics you like better than what you’ve been using. Hearing these clips is an opportunity to expand your sonic horizons and maybe figure out how they made those incredible guitar tones on some of your favorite recordings. Many engineers have listened and learned a lot including Sweetwater’s Mitch Gallagher, Nathan Heironimus and Bobby Dellarocco. Here are the details about what mics and other gear we used.

The Mics
Shure SM57
Telefunken M80-SH
Telefunken M81-SH
Audix i5
sE Electronics V7
Sennheiser e609
Sennheiser e906 (with presence boost engaged)
Beyerdynamic M 88 TG
Audio-Technica AE2300 (no lowpass filter)
Sennheiser MD 421 II (M setting)
Shure SM7B (no bass rolloff, no mid-range emphasis)
AKG C414 XLII (cardioid pattern, -12dB pad engaged)
Neumann U 87 Ai (cardioid pattern, -10dB pad engaged)
Neumann U 47 FET (no pad engaged)
Audio-Technica AT4047/SV (with -10dB pad engaged)
Audio-Technica AT5045
AEA N22
Royer R-121
Royer R-10
sE Electronics Voodoo VR1
Beyerdynamic M 160
The Gear

The Fender ’65 Deluxe Reverb and Friedman BE-100 amp heads in Sweetwater Studio B control room feeding the PRS J-Mod 2×12″ cabinet.

For these recordings, we decided to use two guitar sounds — a dirty sound and a clean sound. Don Carr joined me in the studio with two guitars: a Gibson Les Paul Custom he used for the dirty sound and an LsL Carl Verheyen Special for the clean sound. Don wrote two parts that explored a range of sounds for each tone, and we dialed in the sound by plugging the guitar straight into the amp. Then we recorded a reference track. For the dirty sound, we used a Friedman BE-100, and the clean sound utilized Sweetwater Studios’ highly customized Fender ’65 Deluxe Reverb. Each head was routed into a PRS J-Mod 2 x 12″ cabinet sitting on an Auralex GRAMMA v2 Isolation Riser. Once we were satisfied with the each sound, we plugged the guitar into the DI of a BAE 1073MP Dual and routed that to a Radial Re-amp Kit, which fed the amp chain. We compared the sound of the re-amped signal to the original “guitar straight into amp” signal and satisfied ourselves that we weren’t losing anything sonically. Then we recorded the keeper performances for the dirty and clean clips straight into Pro Tools at 24-bit/96kHz via a Focusrite RedNet 5 clocked to an Antelope Isochrone Trinity.

Don Carr
The challenge was to come up with two short musical examples that highlighted the differences in the mics. The goal was to use as many nuances as I could: muted notes, ringing notes, held chords, high register, low register, etc., in a short clip, while creating something we could endure listening to a thousand times! Seriously, this is one case where the performance needed to be transparent so that the focus could be on the sound. One dirty tone and one clean tone seemed like an obvious choice, and the guitar/amp selection process was pretty straightforward as well. I like the PRS J-Mod cabinet because the universal familiarity of Celestion speakers is great for this type of comparison test. The J-Mod’s G12-65 Heritage speakers have a nice warmth that lends itself to both clean and dirty sounds and retains that quality at fairly high SPLs.

Once I had crafted musical examples that I felt were appropriate, we recorded the performances directly into Pro Tools, and then the process was as easy as switching mics and pressing the Record button. In fact, my job during the entire recording process was to swap the cables from the re-amp box and speaker cabinet into the appropriate amp. A fun afternoon’s work, for sure!

Don Carr
The amplifier settings are shown in the photos below.

Miking the Cabinet
Don and I spent hours experimenting with mic positions on cabinets (read about it in my article The Importance of Mic Placement for Guitar Amps) and used that research to guide our mic placement on the PRS J-Mod cabinet. Starting with the SM57 patched into a Chandler Limited TG Channel Mark II mic preamp, we determined the mic position that best translated the tone. Then we marked that position with 1) a horizontal indicator (which was not a laser during the testing) to align the center of the mic plus 2) a laser that indicated the vertical position and the distance from the speaker grille, which was 1-?”. Using those two indicators, we were able to place all the mic diaphragms in the identical location.

NOTE: Some microphones, like the Neumann U 87 Ai, utilize large elastic shockmounts or, as with the Shure SM7B, windscreens, which restricted us from positioning them identically, but the difference in distance from the grille was never more than a fraction of an inch. It’s not always obvious where the diaphragm is inside a mic, but with a flashlight and some ingenuity, we figured it out.

FOR THE ENGINEERS: You can see a few of the tracks from the original Pro Tools session in the image below, zoomed in to the waveform level, which shows how closely all the mics were aligned. None of the tracks were nudged or time-aligned at all after the original recording. You can see the waveforms for each track (in the highlighted section) and see that the leading edges from the different mics are very closely aligned in time.

Next, we set the level and recorded both clean and dirty clips. At the mic position, the amp was cranking out 113dB SPL (Sound Pressure Level) on the dirty sound and 112dB SPL on the clean sound. No EQ or any other processing was applied. The signal path was the guitar signal from Pro Tools Out > Re-amp > Guitar Amp > Cabinet > Mic > Preamp > Pro Tools In.

Once the sound clips from the first mic were recorded, the re-amping made it a simple matter of swapping in a different mic in the same calibrated position, adjusting the preamp gain, and hitting record. Then we’d change the amp head (input and output) and record again. The levels were set on the preamp (ranging from 10dB to 30dB) for similar deflection on the Pro Tools meters and we recorded all 21 mics identically (dynamics, condensers, and ribbons). I originally planned to set levels utilizing a 1kHz tone, or possibly white or pink noise, but quickly learned how pointless that was. One of the greatest challenges for this comparison was adjusting the gain of these clips for fair evaluation (more details to follow).

What to Listen For
As you listen to these clips, pay attention to the tone of the guitar. Listen for the top-end balance with the bottom end. Listen for the character and personality of the mic — does the mic lend anything distinctive to the sound? Listen for the definition between the notes. Listen for a mic that sounds like the tone you’d like to achieve. Consider which tones would sit well in a track and not require much EQ.

NOTE: I strongly recommend listening on quality speakers or headphones without knowing the identities of the mics. That way, you’ll get a more honest take on the sounds, because knowing which mic is which will probably influence your opinion.

Listen to all the dirty sound clips first with a pen and paper in hand, and write down which mics you prefer. Then make a different list of the ones you prefer on the clean sound. You may be surprised how your opinion changes depending on the guitar tone. Do any of these mics sound equally great on both sounds? For guitar players who mostly play live, those mics may be the best choice, since changing mics in the middle of a set isn’t usually an option. Lastly, once you have made your picks, take a look at how affordable the mics are. If you’re like us, you may discover several that are easily within reach that sound better than what you’re using now.

Prev:Shure X2U

Next:Guitar Cabinet Mic Shootout

Leave a message

Message List

Comments Loading...

Products Category

Products Tags

Fmuser Sites

Guitar Cabinet Mic Shootout

Leave a message

Message List